Publication Ethics Statement:
China Journal of Econometrics (CJoE) advocates for and adheres to the highest standards for accurate and ethical publication of science.
For Authors
1) The author's contributions must be original
works. The contributions and their key contents have never been published
before. Multiple submissions are prohibited. No plagiarism, reference
information should be clearly indicated when citing others' points of view; The
data in this paper are authentic and reliable, without deception, and academic
misconduct such as forgery, tampering or plagiarism shall be strictly
prohibited.
2) All signed authors must contribute to the
research of the paper, and no qualified authors should be omitted.;
Corresponding authors should ensure that the published papers are authorized
and agreed by the co-authors, and there is no signature dispute; Change of
authorship order before publication must obtain the consent of co-authors to
ensure the accuracy of authorship rights.
3) The paper or research funding information
should be indicated in the original manuscript; Other sources of support or
assistance for the publication of the paper or persons who are not qualified to
sign the paper should be clearly stated in the acknowledgements.
4) Modify or withdraw the manuscript: the author
has the right to modify the content of the manuscript before acceptance; Before
the paper is published, the author should not make major changes to the
conclusive research results and methods in the paper. Instead, the author can
revise the statement, data and format in the paper. The author should inform
the editor of any errors discovered at any time. After the editor's approval,
the manuscript that needs to be modified should be revised within the specified
time and returned to the editor. If the revision time is overdue, you can
explain the details to the editor. Without reasonable explanation, manuscripts
will be withdrawn. If the author withdraws by himself, he/she must submit a
retraction application to the editor. Articles suspected of academic
misconduct, such as those reported by others or rechecked by the software
system of academic misconduct, are confirmed to have academic misconduct
problems by experts and will be withdrawn by the Journal. As for the academic
misconduct of published manuscripts, journal issued a retraction statement in
the regular issue, and put the author on the blacklist of authors of the
journal, and no longer accept his manuscripts within five years.
For Reviewers
1) Review comments should be objective and fair,
definitive opinions on the academic value and whether the paper can meet the
publication standards should be given, avoiding ambiguous comments.
2) Respect for diverse academic views, do not
make rude, aggressive comments; Serious scientific misconduct should be
feedback to the editorial office faithfully.
3) If the work or method is not so familiar to
make a peer review, please inform the editorial office to make adjustment; For
paper with conflicts in interests or having shared benefits, avoidance of peer
review is required.
4) When a peer review invitation is accepted,
the review comments should be presented within the planning time; hinders or
delays for completion of review should be notified to the editorial office in
time.
Editor
Conscientiousness
1) Be responsible to ensure the justice of
review and reduce bias; Make efforts to ensure the timely process for
contribution by arranging peer review and publication promptly, especially for
papers with important findings.
2) Ensure the journal publication on time with
schedule; Report novel and authentic researches, give priority to publication
of frontier and hot issues; Academic misconducts, such as plagiarism,
duplication, are definitely rejected.
3) A suitable and competent reviewers’ database
should be established and maintained; Quality of reviewing tasks by
reviews/editorial board members should be objectively recorded and evaluated.
4) Feedback the experts’ review comments to the
author timely; Coordinate academic discussions and communications between the
author and reviewer; Offensive or defamatory comments are rejected; The
author’s appeal on the final decision is accepted.
Fees
The journal does not charge any fees for manuscript processing.
Peer Review
All papers for publication should go through the
process of peer reviews to ensure scholarly integrity.
The journal adopts a single-blind review
process. Peer review experts need to review papers objectively and impartially.
The standard for judging papers is academic quality, and personal criticism of
authors is not allowed.
Copyright
A paper is to be published on the journal after
peer review and correction and the copyright is transferred to the editorial
office of the journal according to the relevant laws or regulations. The exclusive
right of use belongs to the editorial department. The editorial office may
translate, adapt and compile the work or use parts of it to derivate other
works. After publishing, the author agreed to automatically transfer copyrights
to the journal, including electronic publishing, multimedia publishing, web
publishing and other rights in the form of publishing.
